O-Linked Glycans of Candida albicans Interact with Specific GPCRs in the Coronary Endothelium and Inhibit the Cardiac Response to Agonists.

Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that may cause invasive infections in immunocompromised patients, disseminating through the bloodstream to other organs. In the heart, the initial step prior to invasion is the adhesion of the fungus to endothelial cells. Being the fungal cell wall's outermost structure and the first to come in contact with host cells, it greatly modulates the interplay that later will derive in the colonization of the host tissue. In this work, we studied the functional contribution of N-linked and O-linked mannans of the cell wall of C. albicans to the interaction with the coronary endothelium. An isolated rat heart model was used to assess cardiac parameters related to vascular and inotropic effects in response to phenylephrine (Phe), acetylcholine (aCh) and angiotensin II (Ang II) when treatments consisting of: (1) live and heat-killed (HK) C. albicans wild-type yeasts; (2) live C. albicans pmr1Δ yeasts (displaying shorter N-linked and O-linked mannans); (3) live C. albicans without N-linked and O-linked mannans; and (4) isolated N-linked and O-linked mannans were administered to the heart. Our results showed that C. albicans WT alters heart coronary perfusion pressure (vascular effect) and left ventricular pressure (inotropic effect) parameters in response to Phe and Ang II but not aCh, and these effects can be reversed by mannose. Similar results were observed when isolated cell walls, live C. albicans without N-linked mannans or isolated O-linked mannans were perfused into the heart. In contrast, C. albicans HK, C. albicans pmr1Δ, C. albicans without O-linked mannans or isolated N-linked mannans were not able to alter the CPP and LVP in response to the same agonists. Taken together, our data suggest that C. albicans interaction occurs with specific receptors on coronary endothelium and that O-linked mannan contributes to a greater extent to this interaction. Further studies are necessary to elucidate why specific receptors preferentially interact with this fungal cell wall structure.

Candida glabrata binds to glycosylated and lectinic receptors on the coronary endothelial luminal membrane and inhibits flow sense and cardiac responses to agonists.

Candida glabrata (CG) is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that initiates infection by binding to host cells via specific lectin-like adhesin proteins. We have previously shown the importance of lectin-oligosaccharide binding in cardiac responses to flow and agonists. Because of the lectinic-oligosaccharide nature of CG binding, we tested the ability of CG to alter the agonist- and flow-induced changes in cardiac function in isolated perfused guinea pig hearts. Both transmission and scanning electron microscopy showed strong attachment of CG to the coronary endothelium, even after extensive washing. CG shifted the coronary flow vs. auricular-ventricular (AV) delay relationship upward, indicating that greater flow was required to achieve the same AV delay. This effect was completely reversed with mannose, partially reversed with galactose and N-acetylgalactosamine, but hyaluronan had no effect. Western blot analysis was used to determine binding of CG to isolated coronary endothelial luminal membrane (CELM) receptors, and the results indicate that flow-sensitive CELM receptors, ANG II type I, α-adrenergic 1A receptor, endothelin-2, and VCAM-1 bind to CG. In addition, CG inhibited agonist-induced effects of bradykinin, angiotensin, and phenylephrine on AV delay, coronary perfusion pressure, and left ventricular pressure. Mannose reversed the inhibitory effects of CG on the agonist responses. These results suggest that CG directly binds to flow-sensitive CELM receptors via lectinic-oligosaccharide interactions with mannose and disrupts the lectin-oligosaccharide binding necessary for flow-induced cardiac responses.

G protein-coupled receptors mediate coronary flow- and agonist-induced responses via lectin-oligosaccharide interactions.

Blood flow acts parallel to the coronary luminal endothelial surface layer (LESL) and modulates multiple parenchymal functions via the release of paracrine agents. Evidence indicates that the LESL may be a flow-sensing organelle and that perhaps through flow-induced lectin (L)·oligosaccharide (O) complex formation (L·O) participates in this process. LESL integrins and selectins are both lectinic and flow sensitive, but the L properties of flow-sensitive G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the presence of L in the LESL and hypothesized that if flow-sensitive GPCRs are L, flow and O will determine their response to receptor activation. The LESL protein fraction isolated from guinea pig hearts was passed through an affinity chromatography column made of three sugars, mannose, galactose, and N-acetylglucosamine, and the lectinic fraction was eluted. Immune dot blot was used to identify L proteins in the LESL fraction. Our results indicate the following. 1) Two-dimensional SDS-PAGE (2D-SDS-PAGE) of the LESL lectinic fraction revealed at least 167 Ls. 2) Among these Ls, we identified three selectins and the GPCRs: angiotensin II, bradykinin (B2-R), adenosine A1 and A2, prolactin, endothelin, α1-adrenergic (α1A-R), thromboxane A2, ß1-adrenergic, ß3-adrenergic, and insulin receptors; the first six GPCRs are known to be flow sensitive. 3) The amplitude of receptor-induced vascular responses by α1A-R and B2-R activation (phenylephrine or bradykinin, respectively) was a function of flow and O (hyaluronidate). Our results support a novel mechanism of GPCR-mediated responses to flow via L·O interaction.

Molecular weight of different angiotensin II polymers directly determines: density of endothelial membrane AT1 receptors and coronary vasoconstriction.

We have shown that angiotensin II (Ang II) does not diffuse across the vessel wall, remaining intravascularly confined and acting solely on the coronary endothelial luminal membrane (CELM) receptors. A sustained intracoronary infusion of Ang II causes transient coronary vasoconstriction (desensitization) due to membrane internalization of CELM Ang II type 1 receptors (CELM-AT1R). In contrast, sustained intracoronary infusion of a non-diffusible polymer of Ang II (Ang II-Pol, 15,000 kDa) causes a sustained vasoconstriction by preventing CELM-AT1R internalization. In addition, a sustained intracoronary infusion of Ang II leads to a depressed response following a secondary Ang II administration (tachyphylaxis) that is reversed by Ang II-Pol. These findings led us to hypothesize that the rate of desensitization, tachyphylaxis, and AT1R internalization were dependent on Ang II-Pol molecular weight. To test this hypothesis, we synthesized Ang II-Pols of the following molecular weights (in kDa): 1.3, 2.7, 11, 47, 527, 3270 and 15,000. Vasoconstriction was measured following intracoronary infusion of Ang II-Pols in Langendorff-perfused guinea pig hearts at constant flow. The CELM protein fraction was extracted using the silica pellicle technique at different time points in order to determine the rate of AT1R internalization following each Ang II-Pol infusion. CELM-AT1R density was quantified by Western blot. We found that the rate of desensitization and the tachyphylaxis effect varied inversely with the molecular weight of the Ang II-Pols. Inversely proportional to the molecular weight of Ang II-Pol the CELM-AT1R density decreases over time. These results indicate that the mechanism responsible for the decreased rate of desensitization and tachyphylaxis by higher molecular weight Ang II polymers is due to reduction in the rate of CELM-AT1R internalization. These Ang II polymers would be valuable tools for studying the relationship between AT1R internalization and physiological effects.

The coronary endothelium behaves as a functional diffusion barrier for intravascular Angiotensin II.

Diverse intracoronary hormones cause their cardiac effects solely via activation of their coronary endothelial luminal membrane (CELM) receptors. To test this hypothesis for Ang II, we synthesized: a) two large polymers of Ang II (Ang II-POL) and Losartan (Los-POL) which act only in the CELM's AT1R because they cannot cross the endothelial barrier and b) biotin-labeled Ang II (Ang II-Biotin) and Ang II-POL-Biotin to be identified by microscopy in tissues. Sustained coronary perfusion of Ang II (potentially diffusible) or Ang II-POL caused a positive inotropic effect (PIE) and an increase in coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) of equal magnitude that were blocked by Losartan and Los-POL. However, Ang II effects, in contrast to Ang II-POL effects, were transient due to desensitization and resulted in tachyphylaxis to a second administration of Ang II or Ang II-POL. Furthermore, if Ang II and Ang II-POL acted differently on the same receptor; a competition of effects would be expected. This was demonstrated by infusing simultaneously a molar ratio of Ang II:Ang II-POL. As this molar ratio decreased, Ang II-induced desensitization and tachyphylaxis decreased. Intravascularly-administered Ang II-Biotin and Ang II-POL-Biotin remained bound and confined to the endothelium. Our results support the hypothesis and indicate intravascular Ang II, not by mass exchange with the interstitium, but by an action restricted to the CELM's AT1R, causes release of endothelial chemical messengers that exert physiological effects and modulate the effects and metabolism of paracrine Ang II. Endocrine Ang II controls and communicates with its paracrine counterparts solely through endothelial receptors.

Luminal endothelial lectins with affinity for N-acetylglucosamine determine flow-induced cardiac and vascular paracrine-dependent responses.

Coronary blood flow applied to the endothelial lumen modulates parenchymal functions via paracrine effectors, but the mechanism of flow sensation is unknown. We and others have demonstrated that coronary endothelial luminal membrane (CELM) oligosaccharides and lectins are involved in flow detection, and we proposed that cardiac effects of coronary flow result from a reversible flow-modulated lectin-oligosaccharide interaction. Recently, glycosylated and amiloride-sensitive Na(+)/Ca(++) channels (ENaCs) have been proposed to be involved in the flow-induced endothelial responses. Because N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNac) is one of the main components of glycocalyx oligosaccharides (i.e., hyaluronan [-4GlcUAbeta1-3GlcNAcbeta1-](n)), the aim of this article is to isolate and define CELM GlcNac-binding lectins and determine their role in cardiac and vascular flow-induced effects. For this purpose, we synthesized a 460-kDa GlcNac polymer (GlcNac-Pol) with high affinity toward GlcNac-recognizing lectins. In the heart, intracoronary administration of GlcNac-Pol upon binding to CELM diminishes the flow-dependent positive inotropic and dromotropic effects. Furthermore, GlcNac-Pol was used as an affinity probe to isolate CELM GlcNac-Pol-recognizing lectins and at least 35 individual lectinic peptides were identified, one of them the beta-ENaC channel. Some of these lectins could participate in flow sensing and in GlcNac-Pol-induced effects. We also adopted a flow-responsive and well-accepted model of endothelial-parenchymal paracrine interaction: isolated blood vessels perfused at controlled flow rates. We established that flow-induced vasodilatation (FIV) is blocked by endothelial luminal membrane (ELM) bound GlcNac-Pol, nitro-l-arginine methyl ester and indomethacin, amiloride, and hyaluronidase. The effect of hyaluronidase was reversed by infusion of soluble hyaluronan. These results indicate that GlcNac-Pol inhibits FIV by competing and displacing intrinsic hyaluronan bound to a lectinic structure such as the amiloride-sensitive ENaC. Nitric oxide and prostaglandins are the putative paracrine mediators of FIV.

Two dissimilar AT(1) agonists distinctively activate AT(1) receptors located on the luminal membrane of coronary endothelium.

Diverse intracoronary agonists cause cardiac effects while acting on coronary endothelial luminal membrane (CELM) receptor. Our data show: a) the presence of AT(1)R in isolated CELM and in all cardiac cell types and b) sustained intracoronary infusions of Ang II-POL, a large sized molecule (approximately 15,000 kDa) confined to the vessel lumen that can only act on CELM's AT(1)R or Ang II (approximately 1 kDa); both exert the same maximum positive inotropic (PIE) and coronary constriction (CPP). The effects of these two agonists are blocked by Losartan and by Sar-POL; a large size antagonist (approximately 15,000 kDa) that acts only on CELM. Ang II effects are transient due to desensitization and cause tachyphylaxis to Ang II and toward Ang II-POL suggesting that both Ang II and Ang II-POL act on the same receptor group. In contrast, Ang II-POL effects are sustained and do not cause tachyphylaxis. The results show that intravascular Ang II and Ang II-POL act differentially by an unknown mechanism on CELM's AT(1)R and suggest that intravascular Ang II and Ang II-POL cause PIE and CCP by activation limited to CELM's AT(1)R through an unknown mechanism that is space-confined to the CELM's AT(1)R.